3.1 - Bhagavad Gita - Chapter 3, Verse 1

अर्जुन उवाच
ज्यायसी चेत्कर्मणस्ते मता बुद्धिर्जनार्दन ।
तत्किं कर्मणि घोरे मां नियोजयसि केशव ॥ १ ॥

Audio Narration

English Transliteration

arjuna uvācha
jyāyasī chet karmaṇas te matā buddhir janārdana
tat kiṁ karmaṇi ghore māṁ niyojayasi keśhava

Hindi Translation of Bhagavad Gita 3.1

श्लोक १: अर्जुन ने कहा - हे जनार्दन! यदि आप ज्ञान को कर्म से श्रेष्ठ मानते हैं, तो हे केशव, आप मुझे इस भयानक कर्म को करने के लिए क्यों कह रहे हैं?

English Translation of Bhagavad Gita 3.1

Shloka 1: Arjuna said - O Janardana! If you consider knowledge superior to action,then O Keshava, why are you urging me to engage in this dreadful task?

Meaning of Bhagavad Gita 3.1

In Bhagavad Gita 3.1, Arjuna voices his deep confusion to Krishna, seeking clarification regarding what he perceives as contradictory guidance. Arjuna recalls that Krishna earlier spoke highly of knowledge and the cultivation of spiritual intelligence (buddhi), suggesting that this form of higher wisdom is superior to ordinary actions, especially those driven by worldly desires. At the same time, Krishna is urging him into the turmoil of battle, which appears to Arjuna as a terrible, violent act. Struggling to reconcile these two instructions, Arjuna asks: if knowledge surpasses action, why is he being compelled to fight in this dreadful war?

This verse marks a key moment in the dialogue, highlighting Arjuna's internal turmoil. He equates the path of wisdom and soul realization with renunciation — the act of giving up worldly deeds — and so he believes that a person established in spiritual knowledge should abstain from action altogether, especially from actions as grim as war. Arjuna’s confusion stems from his assumption that action and knowledge are mutually exclusive paths. He cannot understand how Krishna can advocate for both, and thus seeks a definitive answer that will resolve his conflict.

The core of Arjuna’s question revolves around the perceived opposition between two ideals: the path of wisdom, which he associates with renunciation or non-action, and the path of karma, which involves engagement in worldly duties and works. Krishna’s insistence on action as a duty, even after emphasizing the value of wisdom, appears to him as ambiguous and contradictory. Arjuna respectfully addresses Krishna as Janardana and Keshava, acknowledging his divinity and seeking clear guidance from the one he trusts as his spiritual mentor and friend.

Underlying Arjuna’s inquiry is a common spiritual dilemma—how does one reconcile the pursuit of transcendence and inner realization with the responsibilities and actions required by one’s role in the world? Arjuna stands on the battlefield, torn between the wisdom of detachment and the practical demands of action. The war before him is not a mere metaphor but a real and violent struggle, making the question all the more urgent and poignant for him. It represents the broader human struggle to integrate higher knowledge with everyday obligations.

Arjuna’s questioning also reveals his humility and sincerity. Instead of merely arguing or resisting, he approaches Krishna for further illumination, admitting his confusion and the limits of his current understanding. By seeking clear, unequivocal guidance, Arjuna opens the door for Krishna to explain the subtle harmony between knowledge (jnana) and action (karma), which becomes the primary focus in the ensuing portion of the Gita.

This verse also sets the stage for the introduction of Karma Yoga, which will be elaborated in the third chapter. Krishna emphasizes that performing one's responsibilities is inevitable and necessary, and that the real wisdom lies in combining right action with the right understanding—acting without selfish attachment and with dedication to a higher purpose. Rather than abandoning action on the grounds of spiritual detachment, the Gita will teach that enlightened action is a vehicle for both personal and collective upliftment.

Thus, Bhagavad Gita 3.1 is a pivotal verse, expressing the common seeker’s confusion when faced with what appears to be dual and opposing advice from the spiritual teacher. It signals a transition in the teaching, prompting an exploration into how wisdom and action are not just compatible but mutually reinforcing when understood deeply. Arjuna’s candid question is not a sign of disobedience but of honest engagement with the teachings, serving as a bridge for the profound insights that will follow in the dialogue between Krishna and Arjuna.

Read verses on the BGFA App

Experience the Bhagavad Gita in a modern avatar on the BGFA app, with videos, explanations, lessons and more!