2.6 - Bhagavad Gita - Chapter 2, Verse 6

न चैतद्विद्मः कतरन्नो गरीयो
यद्वा जयेम यदि वा नो जयेयुः ।
यानेव हत्वा न जिजीविषाम-
स्तेऽवस्थिताः प्रमुखे धार्तराष्ट्राः ॥ ६ ॥

Audio Narration

English Transliteration

na chaitadvidmaḥ kataranno garīyo
yadvā jayema yadi vā no jayeyuḥ
yāneva hatvā na jijīviṣhāmas
te ’vasthitāḥ pramukhe dhārtarāṣhṭrāḥ

Hindi Translation of Bhagavad Gita 2.6

और मैं नहीं जानता कि क्या श्रेष्ठतर होगा, हमारा कौरवों को हरा देना या स्वयं पराजित हो जाना। मैं उन्हें मारकर नहीं जीना चाहता। फिर भी धृतराष्ट्र के पुत्र इस युद्ध क्षेत्र में हमारे विरुद्ध युद्ध करने के लिए तैयार खड़े हैं।

English Translation of Bhagavad Gita 2.6

Nor do I know whether it would be better if we defeat them (the Kauravas) or if they defeat us. I have no desire to live after slaying them. Yet, here stand the sons of Dhritarashtra, prepared to fight against us on this battlefield.

Meaning of Bhagavad Gita 2.6

In Bhagavad Gita verse 2.6, Arjuna finds himself engulfed in profound uncertainty and inner conflict as he stands on the battlefield of Kurukshetra. Surrounded by his revered teachers, beloved elders, and kinsmen, he is unable to decide what path lies ahead for him—whether fighting or refraining from battle is the more righteous course. The weight of his predicament is immense; whatever he chooses, the consequences will be deeply impactful, not just for himself but for everyone involved. This moment captures Arjuna’s genuine confusion where no option seems clearly right or easy to embrace.

Arjuna’s words in this verse lay bare the complexity of his feelings. He candidly admits that he cannot determine what is ultimately good or bad—whether victory in battle, which would mean defeating and possibly killing his own kin, or defeat, which could cost him his life or the prosperity and peace of his family. He articulates his predicament in such a way that his internal struggle becomes palpable; he is neither willing to kill those he loves nor able to walk away without facing the consequences of abandoning his duties as a warrior. This stark honesty is a defining trait of Arjuna at this juncture—he is not concealing his confusion but bravely confronting it.

With each possibility he contemplates, Arjuna recognizes some kind of loss or pain. If he fights and wins, he may gain a kingdom, but at the cost of killing those he holds dear, leaving him with a hollow victory and a life deprived of true happiness. On the other hand, if he does not fight, he faces the darkness of disgrace, the fate of living as a beggar shorn of honor, and the suffering of his people who depend on him for protection and leadership. Arjuna is essentially paralyzed, unable to find a way out that preserves both his values and his sense of duty.

What makes this verse especially poignant is its universality. Arjuna’s dilemma is not simply the hesitation of a soldier struggling with his conscience; it is the human struggle itself, the tension between personal desire and ethical responsibility, between immediate emotion and long-term consequences. He is caught in a vortex where each path is shadowed by undesirable outcomes. In acknowledging that he does not know which course will be better, Arjuna exposes his vulnerability—a vulnerability that is very relatable to anyone facing a life-altering decision.

The scene also reflects Arjuna’s deep attachment and emotional bonds with his family and mentors. His heart is torn between his profound love for those on the opposite side and the expectations placed upon him as a warrior and leader. Instead of impulsively choosing a side, he pauses to reflect, to question, and to seek clarity. This very act of reflection, of not rushing into action without understanding, is a vital part of his character and the philosophical journey he is about to undertake with Krishna’s guidance.

Arjuna’s uncertainty is not just a lack of information; it is a deeper existential doubt. What gives life meaning if one has to inflict suffering upon loved ones for the sake of duty? Can fulfillment ever be found in victory achieved through such sacrifice? Such questions transcend the battlefield and enter the realm of philosophical inquiry. Embedded in Arjuna’s confusion is the timeless question: How does one reconcile duty with emotion, obligation with love, and action with conscience?

The significance of this verse is heightened by Arjuna’s willingness to openly declare his inability to decide. Rather than masking his hesitation, he expresses it, demonstrating both humility and sincerity. In doing so, he sets the stage for receiving guidance, acknowledging that he cannot navigate this crisis alone. This openness lays the groundwork for the profound teachings Krishna is about to deliver, showing that the journey to wisdom often begins with the honest admission of uncertainty.

This verse is, therefore, not a moment of weakness but of realism and self-awareness. Arjuna’s predicament brings to light the intricate interplay between personal values, societal expectations, and the far-reaching impact of one’s choices. It marks a turning point in the narrative, signaling the transition from emotion-driven hesitation to the quest for clarity and understanding. In these few lines, Arjuna’s voice resonates with anyone who has ever stood at the crossroads of a difficult decision, unsure of which path leads to true fulfillment.